<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Performance Direct Digital Marketing. Delivering Quality Customers and Quality for Customers. &#187; Search Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/index.php/category/search-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog</link>
	<description>HauteProspect [oht pros-pekt] –noun: 1. skill, technology and media for your next direct digital marketing campaign.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:05:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Should email be like search?</title>
		<link>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/09/19/should-email-be-like-search/</link>
		<comments>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/09/19/should-email-be-like-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/09/19/should-email-be-like-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is couple ideas (blink) for isps. Go beyond feedback loops, filtering and spam button as means to determine legitimacy and reputation of the mailers. Can you apply ppc&#8217;s &#8216;quality score&#8217; concept to email messages and determine them worthy based on users clickthrough and engagement? Can you go to the source of the message and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="big">Here is couple ideas (blink) for isps. Go beyond feedback loops, filtering and spam button as means to determine legitimacy and reputation of the mailers. Can you apply ppc&#8217;s &#8216;quality score&#8217; concept to email messages and determine them worthy based on users clickthrough and engagement? Can you go to the source of the message and review the landing page quality &#8211; (require website analytics sharing if necessary) to see if people bounce or stay, convert or not, make it into satisfied customers?</p>
<p class="big">Isn&#8217;t that a better way to eliminate those unworthy marketers, who do not offer their audience what they want, or blindly market to the same not interested people over an over clogging isps bandwidth and people&#8217;s mailboxes?</p>
<p class="big">And email marketers &#8211; learn from search.  You&#8217;ll be amazed at results derived via dynamic segmentation of your static lists.  Some call it &#8217;saved search selects&#8217; other &#8217;smart lists&#8217; and building your targetting model around them is a skill worth investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/09/19/should-email-be-like-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do email, search and banner ads have in common?</title>
		<link>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/08/30/what-do-email-search-and-banner-ads-have-in-common/</link>
		<comments>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/08/30/what-do-email-search-and-banner-ads-have-in-common/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/08/30/what-do-email-search-and-banner-ads-have-in-common/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behavioral targeting has been catching wind for some time now. Now with existance of behavioral networks almost every publisher is getting on board and BT is part of any serious media buying plan. Retargeting, profiling, click streaming, triggers, statistics and response modelling are some of the rules of the game.
There are at least dozen companies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="big">Behavioral targeting has been catching wind for some time now. Now with existance of behavioral networks almost every publisher is getting on board and BT is part of any serious media buying plan. Retargeting, profiling, click streaming, triggers, statistics and response modelling are some of the rules of the game.</p>
<p class="big">There are at least dozen companies that understand how to feed these channels off of each other through analytics. In the search/display scene it&#8217;s Google (watch what comes out of Doubleclick&#8217;s acquisition), Yahoo (&#8217;smart ads&#8217;) and 24/7 (search retargetting) to name a few &#8230; and in the email field? Well, we might put that one to the quiz &#8211; look for acquisitions in the email marketing industry as a clue .. any guesses?</p>
<p class="big">As more marketers become knowledgeable in the subject, you&#8217;re going to notice the emergence of winners &#8211; those who don&#8217;t just profile their users based on historical responses, but those with extensive publisher and advertisers relationships, know how and technology allowing for data intelligence sharing.  It helps to own your media, affiliate networks, display, search agencies &#8230; since applying behavioral targeting to email and other channels involves heavy use of unique user tracking, website analytics and other marketing intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/08/30/what-do-email-search-and-banner-ads-have-in-common/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of course we&#8217;ll link to you</title>
		<link>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/07/23/of-course-well-link-to-you/</link>
		<comments>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/07/23/of-course-well-link-to-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/07/23/of-course-well-link-to-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of us SEO practitioners know the value of linking in today&#8217;s Google dominated environment.  Is there a webmaster out there who hasn&#8217;t yet received a reciprocoal link request email?  Links are bartered and bought, boards, forums or amazing services like squidoo get punished as victims of seo spam &#8211; have it all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="big">All of us SEO practitioners know the value of linking in today&#8217;s Google dominated environment.  Is there a webmaster out there who hasn&#8217;t yet received a reciprocoal link request email?  Links are bartered and bought, boards, forums or amazing services like <a target="_blank" title="google's penalty on squidoo" href="http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=3626420">squidoo get punished</a> as victims of seo spam &#8211; have it all gone too far?<span id="more-17"></span></p>
<p class="big">Google&#8217;s answer to that? Penalize reciprocal linking (the kind of exchanges where I link to you and you link to me &#8211; usually from the &#8216;links page&#8217; of 100s).  But even before the idea surfaced, the 3way exchanges started.</p>
<p class="big">Is it time to go back to basics?  Has the concept of PR failed?</p>
<p class="big">Unfortunately there is no way back.  That is at least until Brin, Page, Schmidt and Co. rule the search planet &#8211; PR is what google was born out of.  There is nothing like a link from the PR8, same vertical, high traffic site.  What&#8217;s left is to be smart about it.  Choose your partners carefully.  Once you&#8217;re linked to and cached by robots, it&#8217;s hard to take it back.  Focus on quality and common sense &#8211; if you did you&#8217;d have realized that deep inside you look down on reciprocal linking.  Bet on good content, work with smart viral marketers and next time the linking specialist pitches you on his/her service &#8211; ask &#8211; how many partners do you have in your network now that can link to us tomorrow, out of content which simply begs to reference sources like us.  (and that&#8217;s without asking for return link right away)</p>
<p class="big">
<p class="big">PS.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t attended the latest SES conference &#8211; there was a very interesting discussion on the issue.  Seamoz has a great recap <a target="_blank" title="seamoz recap of SES San Jose discussion on paid links" href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-paid-links-debate-rages-on-ses-san-jose-2007">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/07/23/of-course-well-link-to-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google going ahead with CPA pricing</title>
		<link>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/21/google-going-ahead-with-cpa-pricing/</link>
		<comments>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/21/google-going-ahead-with-cpa-pricing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/21/google-going-ahead-with-cpa-pricing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While many are still on the waiting list for their adsense referrals to be opened to other advertisers, Google is not looking back.  Today&#8217;s launch of beta adwords CPA pricing has made many of our clients happy &#8211; especially those in verticals that we&#8217;re observing an ever increasing CPCs.

As an advertiser you need a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="big">While many are still on the waiting list for their <a target="_blank" title="adsense cpa" href="http://adsense.blogspot.com/2007/03/now-accepting-applications-for-new.html">adsense referrals</a> to be opened to other advertisers, Google is not looking back.  Today&#8217;s launch of <a target="_blank" title="adwords CPA" href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2007/03/pay-per-action-beta-test.html">beta adwords CPA</a> pricing has made many of our clients happy &#8211; especially those in verticals that we&#8217;re observing an ever increasing CPCs.<span id="more-15"></span></p>
<p class="big">
<p class="big">As an advertiser you need a conversion tracking enabled and over 500 conversions last month in order to be considered.  We welcome the news.</p>
<p class="big">Some CPA/lead gen. networks are trembling at what it will do to their business, but as search marketers we have to be thrilled about an attempt by Google to minimize click fraud (which <a target="_blank" title="click fraud magnitude" href="http://clickz.com/showPage.html?page=3625138">Google claims</a> to be at .02% and we dare to think is at least 100 times that).</p>
<p class="big">BTW, let&#8217;s track the development of <a target="_blank" title="clickforensics.com click fraud study" href="http://www.clickforensics.com/news/pressreleases/mitstudy.htm">this study</a> &#8211; should be authoritative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/21/google-going-ahead-with-cpa-pricing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sopranos hit by Web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/11/sopranos-hit-the-web-20/</link>
		<comments>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/11/sopranos-hit-the-web-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/11/sopranos-hit-the-web-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rumors of the HBO&#8217;s site crash after the Sopranos&#8217; finale last night. People were not happy with how it all went down, went to the site to post few honest comments and bang!
HauteProspect does not currently have any clients in the entertainment vertical, but wonders if anyone planned any major viral or search campaign around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="big">Rumors of the HBO&#8217;s site crash after the Sopranos&#8217; finale last night. People were not happy with how it all went down, went to the site to post few honest comments and bang!<span id="more-13"></span></p>
<p class="big">HauteProspect does not currently have any clients in the entertainment vertical, but wonders if anyone planned any major viral or search campaign around an event of such magnitude? Anticipation is &#8216;what Tiggers like the most!&#8217;</p>
<p class="big">Seriously though, the entire SEO industry is changing with the announcement of <a title="Universal Search" target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/pressrel/universalsearch_20070516.html">Universal Search</a> by Google. What this really got us thinking about and preparring for here at HauteProspect is the effect of what we call &#8216;Google&#8217;s blending of the media&#8217;. Will the mention in tv, radio, a/v or print someday be affecting the online search algorithms? We mean after Google&#8217;s scans all the books in the world, broadcasts radio, cable ads, and buys a game development company.</p>
<p class="big">We know it will and we love that new frontier of search engine optimization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/11/sopranos-hit-the-web-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catching up?</title>
		<link>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/05/catching-up/</link>
		<comments>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/05/catching-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 02:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/07/catching-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3 big events today kept us busy. First this email from Yahoo Search Marketing:
&#8220;Quality-Based Pricing Launches
Key Features
• We&#8217;ll evaluate the quality of traffic from our distribution partners&#8217; sites.
• Your click charges can be discounted based on the value of that traffic.
• Discounts will automatically be applied to your account.&#8221;
&#8230; then a formal rollout of Yahoo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="big">3 big events today kept us busy. First this email from Yahoo Search Marketing:<span id="more-11"></span></p>
<p class="big"><strong>&#8220;Quality-Based Pricing Launches</strong></p>
<p class="big"><strong>Key Features</strong></p>
<p class="big"><strong>•</strong> We&#8217;ll evaluate the quality of traffic from our distribution partners&#8217; sites.</p>
<p class="big"><strong>• </strong>Your click charges can be discounted based on the value of that traffic.</p>
<p class="big"><strong>•</strong> Discounts will automatically be applied to your account.&#8221;</p>
<p class="big">&#8230; then a formal rollout of Yahoo API. And that got our programmers busy. Pricing is the most interesting aspect &#8211; various levels with lots of it for free &#8211; got HauteProspect smiling &#8211; will Google finally do something 2nd?</p>
<p class="big">To finish the day &#8211; the announcement of the new ask.com interface. HP likes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/05/catching-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of Adsense arbitrage &#8211; makes sense?</title>
		<link>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/03/end-of-adsense-arbitrage-makes-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/03/end-of-adsense-arbitrage-makes-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/03/end-of-adsense-arbitrage-makes-sense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a month it&#8217;s been. Google shaked a world again for several of our medium traffic clients this month. Especially those that monetize part or all of their traffic with Adsense. CPMs started dropping for no apparent reasons beginning of the month and driving paid search campaign seemed to cause effects far from desirable. Then [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="big">What a month it&#8217;s been. Google shaked a world again for several of our medium traffic clients this month. Especially those that monetize part or all of their traffic with Adsense. CPMs started dropping for no apparent reasons beginning of the month and driving paid search campaign seemed to cause effects far from desirable. Then the story of &#8216;war against MFA sites&#8217; <a title="adotas about adsense arbitrage war" target="_blank" href="http://www.adotas.com/2007/05/google-cleans-house/">leaked</a> and suddenly things started making sense.<span id="more-9"></span></p>
<p class="big">Let us be absolutely clear &#8211; those clients were not Adsense arbitrage sites. The only mistake they have made was to put all or too many eggs in one basket. Many reputable content sites across many verticals were to be hurt this past month simply by what we believe was Google&#8217;s &#8216;algorithm arbitrage&#8217;.</p>
<p class="big">We&#8217;re proud here at HauteProspect to have spotted this before the rest of the industry had. It wasn&#8217;t our technology or our own algorithms that did it; a simple micro management did. Fast decisions of our campaign managers and HauteProspect&#8217;s relationships helped to diversify and monetize the traffic for the month that secured or exceeded revenue expectations.</p>
<p class="big">Cheers,</p>
<p class="big">HauteProspect Team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/03/end-of-adsense-arbitrage-makes-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google shooting itself in the foot – a la Microsoft?</title>
		<link>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/05/03/is-google-shooting-itself-in-the-foot-%e2%80%93-a-la-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/05/03/is-google-shooting-itself-in-the-foot-%e2%80%93-a-la-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/05/03/is-google-shooting-itself-in-the-foot-%e2%80%93-a-la-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no doubt Google rules the search landscape leaving its closest competitors further in the dust month after month. Now that Microsoft-Yahoo merger rumors slowly exhaust will anyone ever catch up? Or will Google, tempted to maintain its growth rate and market share, make mistakes seen only in the pre-Microsoft regulation era? Will Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="big">There is no doubt Google rules the search landscape leaving its closest competitors further in the dust month after month. Now that Microsoft-Yahoo merger rumors slowly exhaust will anyone ever catch up? Or will Google, tempted to maintain its growth rate and market share, make mistakes seen only in the pre-Microsoft regulation era? Will Google lose its focus on search while sticking its fingers into radio, tv, video, video games or display ads or is it all a part of CEO Schmidt’s strategy he calls – Universal Search?<span id="more-7"></span></p>
<p class="big">We’re not psychic here at HauteProspect, but could the danger to Google’s domination be coming from their own house. Genius that drives them slowly towards monopoly may soon get in the way. Click fraud is becoming more serious of an issue each month which is only now being seriously tackled by Google through war against <a title="adsense arbitrage war" target="_blank" href="http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/06/03/end-of-adsense-arbitrage-makes-sense/">adsense arbitrage</a> but stems from low quality control of their powerful ad distribution network. Latest ideas of ‘<a title="personalized search" href="http://searchengineland.com/070202-224617.php">personalized search</a>’ or how it is now called ‘web history’ are great and in line of Schmidt’s strategy, but is Google forgetting about privacy? How many people are actually opting into their ‘web history’ what is effectively becoming Google’s behavioral targeting network? How many users will favor being profiled while playing video games? (nothing wrong with behavioral targeting of course – relevancy in marketing is what we’re here all about) Privacy advocates are concerned however. FTC is looking at the latest G’s acquisition &#8211; DoubleClick (company with <a title="doubleclick privacy lawsuit" target="_blank" href="http://www.out-law.com/page-2486">history of lawsuits</a> brought by privacy advocates). The European regulators have been monitoring the behemoth’s moves as well.</p>
<p class="big">We continue working with Google’s technologies as they do wonders for our clients’ ROI; and would hate to see company being forced to be broken down – so Googlers – keep the growth under control – change the world one step at the time for your own good.</p>
<p class="big">Yours,</p>
<p class="big">HauteProspect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hauteprospect.com/yblog/2007/05/03/is-google-shooting-itself-in-the-foot-%e2%80%93-a-la-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

